Vetting and barring scheme to affect 2m fewer people

By Charlotte Goddard
Children & Young People Now
14 December 2009

The government's controversial vetting and barring scheme will affect two million fewer people than previously thought, according to Children's Secretary Ed Balls.

The government has accepted all the recommendations of Sir Roger Singleton, who was reviewing the scheme, including that fewer people should have to be vetted before working with children and young people. The scheme, which will now affect those with weekly rather than monthly contact with children, will now cover nine million instead of 11 million people.

Speaking on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show at the weekend, Balls said: "What we've done is we've reduced the test down from monthly contact to weekly contact, and I think that's the right thing to do. We've also said that a foreign exchange trip or an author going from school to school won't be affected."

He said parents had never been covered by the scheme: "A head teacher who is saying that you should not come into school without a check, that you shouldn't help with a school play - that is a ludicrous overreaction in exactly the same way, if you ask me, a head teacher who says you can't play conkers in the playground. There's no rule which says that. Heads have got to use their judgement."

Singleton's report, Drawing the Line, also recommended that: people such as authors who go into different schools or similar settings to work with different groups of children will not be required to register; older pupils participating in work experience and community placement schemes should not have to be registered; and parents hosting pupils on exchange visits lasting less than 28 days will not have to register, as long as the overseas parents accept the responsibility for the selection of the host family.

Singleton said: "I believe that once adjustments to the rules have been made, this scheme will provide a good balance between ensuring the need to protect children without being an unnecessary burden."

 

 

Article Tools
 

Comments

Please log in or register to comment

Posted Comments

Rob Shorrock - 16 December 2009

This is actually a good report that attempts to balance safeguarding duties with the needs of schools and other organisation to be able to recruit volunteers. It is going to be interesting to see how Local Authorities and schools manage safeguarding with the duty to offer extended services within schools from 2010, including access by the community to facilities. There is an inherent tension here which will need further guidance.

Louisa Southey - 15 December 2009

I agree with Brid, we need to discuss these issues in depth not bring in a load of new laws due to a knee jerk reaction to individual cases.

Brid Hehir - 14 December 2009

The government's partial climbdown on vetting remains inadequate. Instead, the ISA and the vetting database should be scrapped. These were introduced during a climate of fear to prevent a repeat of the Soham murders, but without open or rational discussion. A debate about the protection of vulnerable people is needed instead. The founding assumption that nine million of us are potential paedophiles until proven otherwise remains unchallenged and needs to be discussed.

Roy Everett - 14 December 2009

Mr Balls may well think that, if you ask him, a head teacher who is saying that you should not come into school without a check [e.g. to help with a school play] is over-reacting. However, such a stipulation is precisely what some head teachers or school management boards do. So there ARE rules, albeit local to the schools, which say that parents need checks. Until Mr Balls explicitly vetoes the practice of making such local rulesor it is vetoed by the courts in a test case his statement is false.

Latest Jobs

Find jobs working with children and young people

Circa £19,000 per annum, Central London
£28,633 to £31,242, East Midlands
£26.5k - £31k pa, South East England
£25-£39K, East of England